vtbw With the Fujifilm X... 投稿者：MethrenSor 投稿日：2025/01/10(Fri) 07:30 No.20052144 
Flel Mike Cahill s Bliss Is a Sci-Fi Fantasy About Hitting Rock Bottom
might have been my firs <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk>stanley thermos mug</a> t foray into digital photography, but my first real digital camerahe one that taught me the basics of photography and digital post-processingas also one of the first true prosumer digital cameras to hit the market in 2000: t <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley france</a> he Canon PowerShot G1. Although my uncle had a basement full of photography gear including a giant enlarger and my mom had a bag full of Pentax SLR film cameras, my childhood experience with photography was limited to an old Kodak Disc film camera: a consolation prize from the company after a lawsuit from Polaroid prevented it from producing or selling instant film, rendering my <a href=https://www.stanleycup.cz>stanley termohrnek</a> parents Kodak instant camera instantly obsolete. It was a basic point-and-shoot camera and while loading the disk-shaped film was easy enough for a 10-year-old to do, the film was expensive well played, Kodak and I had better things to spend my hard-earned birthday money on. https://gizmodo/i-miss-the-game-boy-camera-my-first-digital-camera-1846086726 Years later the Game Boy Camera rekindled an interest in photography, but its capabilities were limited and there wasnt much room for exploration or to expand ones skills. I was also in college when the Game Boy Camera was released, and while real digital cameras started to become more popular and drop in price, they were still expensive toys with very limited resolutions and functionality. Unless you were willing to invest thousands of dollars, you were basically getting a digital point-and-shoot wh Iuzo Frances Allen, Who Pioneered Faster Software for Computers, Dies at 88
If drones arent chasing firefighters away from a fire, then theyre probably close enough that the delicate plastic and sensitive sensors are slowly melting. Fire and drones are basically a terrible combination in every way, unless theyre a tool being used by firefighters to map out a burning building. https://gizmodo/firefighters-cant-save-people-burning-in-cars-because-o-1718675039 FAROS the Fireproof Aerial RObot System is a d <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup becher</a> rone thats supposed to be used by firefighters to find victims and fires inside a burning building. It looks at first appearance like a run-of-the-mill quadrotor, but with the rotors on the bottom, and the ability to stick to walls. On the outside, it has an aramid shell that enables <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.uk>stanley bottle</a> it to resist heat. Once its inside a building, the drone uses an inertial guidance system and 2D laser scanner to find its way around, and a thermal imaging camera to seek out fires and humans. All the data is transmitted back to firefighters, who can use the intel to plan a much more strategic attack on the building, rather than blundering around looking for people. None of the technology is particularly groundbreaking on its own: laser sensors and thermal imaging cameras have been on drones in the past, and autonomous flying is not really new. But add it all together, hopefully put it in the hands of fire dep <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.ca>stanley cup</a> artments sometime in the near future, and you probably have a tool that can save some actual lives. <FAROS>via Gizmag]
|