zmgz Rick and Morty Fina... 投稿者:MethrenSor 投稿日:2025/01/05(Sun) 12:39 No.20038979
Sfsi South Korea Preps Serious Anti-Drone Measures Ahead of Winter Olympics due to director Taika Waititis major commitments elsewhere. And while some viewed that as another death knell on another failed adaptation of Akira, Waititi isnt so sure. Talking recently to IGN, the director spoke about his schedule, the conflicts that led to Akira being at least temporarily shelved, and his eagerness to get back to it. Unfortunately, the timing with Akira, because weve been working really hard on the script, we had to <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.fr>stanley thermos</a> keep pushing back the start date for the shoot <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley mug</a> , Waititi explained. We ended up having to push it a couple weeks too far, which actually ate into the Thor schedule because they were very close together. And that got pushed again and again, and it just got too far into the Thor schedule to be able to make it work. And my first commitment was to Marvel to make that film, so now Ive kind of had to take Akira and sort of shift it around to the tail-end of Thor and move it down a couple of years. Its not surprising that the script would give the production trouble. Katushiro Otomos original work is a sprawling, dense epic, and the anime adaptation only functioned by essentially cutting it into pieces and turning the first third or so into a self-contained albeit confusing story. Its been called unfilmable for a reason. https://gizmodo/taika-waititi-is-back-for-thor-4-but-akira-is-on-hold-1836417748 But its valuable to know that Waititi will be getting back to it sometime. Though, honestly, maybe some projects should jus <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.us>stanley mugs</a> t be left undone. F Uehi NASA Is Sending Artificial Female Bodies to the Moon to Study Radiation Risks In a study conducted at the Carnegie Institution for Science at UC Irvine, 77 of the worlds leading atmospheric scientists were surveyed on the subject of chemtrails, with all except one saying they hadnt encountered any evidence of any secret spraying program. The findings, which were published in Environmental Research Letters, showcase the expert opinions of atmospheric chemists who specialize in condensation trails and geochemists who work on atmospheric dust. The spraying could be explained by other factors, they said, including airplane contrail formation and poor data sampling, along with well-understood physics and chemistry associated with the subject. We wanted to establish a scientific record on the topic of secret atmospheric spraying programs for the benefit of those in the public who havent mad <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cups</a> e up their minds, said Steven Davis, an author on the study. The experts we su <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.de>stanley isolierkanne</a> rveyed resoundingly rejected contrail photographs and test results as evidence of a large-scale atmospheric conspiracy. Chemtrails have taken the blame for a number of concerns, including glob <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.co.nz>stanley mug</a> al warming, and its not a niche belief. A 2011 international survey showed that nearly 17 percent of participants believed partially in the existence of such a program. One article over at Geo Engineering Watch, written in 2016, says that the spraying is done to offset the heating effect an increasing amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. The author writes: These observed persistent contra
|