peoq Weakening Ophelia s... 投稿者：MethrenSor 投稿日：2024/11/24(Sun) 13:26 No.19429838 
Nlvm COVID-19 cases continue to plummet in Wisconsin; officials urge residents to be cautious
Top diplomats from the Group of Seven leading industrial democracies announced a unified stance on the Israel-Hamas war on Wednesday after intensive meetings in Tokyo, condemning Hamas, supporting Israel s right to self-defense and calling for humanitarian pauses to speed aid to desperate civilians in the Gaza Strip.In a statement following two days of talks, the nations sought to balance unequivocal criticism of Hamas attacks against Israel and the need for urgent action to help civilians in the besieged Palestin <a href=https://www.stanleycups.ro>stanley cups</a> ian enclave. All parties must allow unimpeded humanitarian support for civilians, including food, water, medical care, fuel and shelter, and access for humanitarian workers, said the statement, hammered out by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and foreign ministers from Br <a href=https://www.stanley1913.com.es>vaso stanley</a> itain, Canada, France, Germany, Japan and Italy. We support humanitarian pauses and corridors to fac <a href=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us>stanley tumbler</a> ilitate urgently needed assistance, civilian movement and the release of hostages. The G7 meeting was, in part, an attempt to contain the worsening humanitarian crisis while also keeping broader differences on Gaza from deepening. It came at a very intense time for our countries and for the world, Blinken said in remarks to reporters, adding that G7 unity is stronger and more important than ever. The ministers noted that the G7 is working intensively to prevent the conflict from escalating further and spreading more widely, and also using sanctions and other measures to deny Hamas th Lzxm House Judiciary Committee subpoenas Meta s Threads app over censorship
WASHINGTON, D.C. ?The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday to uphold two Arizona voting restrictions, rejecting claims that the provisions discriminate against people of color. The court was split on the landmark voting rights case. The vote was 6-3 along ideological lines.Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Justice Elena Kagan filed a dissenting opinion and was joined by Justices St <a href=https://www.stanleycups.com.mx>stanley cup</a> ephen G. Breyer and Sonia S <a href=https://www.stanleymug.us>starbucks stanley cup</a> otomayor.Alito wrote that the state of Arizonas interest in the integri <a href=https://www.stanleycups.com.mx>stanley tazas</a> ty of elections justified the measures, while Kagan argued that the court was weakening Voting Rights Act for the second time in eight years. What is tragic here is that the Court has yet again rewritten ?in order to weaken ?a statute that stands as a monument to Americas greatness, and protects against its basest impulses. What is tragic is that the Court has damaged a statute designed to bring about the end of discrimination in voting. I respectfully dissent, wrote Kagan.The ruling could have far-reaching implications as Republicans have introduced a slew of bills in statehouses across the country that attempt to limit how and when Americans can cast a ballot.The decision could make it more difficult to challenge those voting measures that were put in place by GOP lawmakers in the wake of last years election.The case, which was argued in February, involves Arizona
|