shtn Lib Dems to push fo... 投稿者：Morrissmom 投稿日：2025/01/08(Wed) 23:29 No.20048744
Hdda Man who killed wife in act of great violence jailed for five years
Boris Johnson had been in power for six months when Covid hit Britain and sparked the greatest peacetime crisis in a century. His departure, with the worst of t <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk>stanley cup</a> he pandemic surely behind us, means his tenure will be framed by his handling of the virus. To some he got the big decisio <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley mug</a> ns right . To others he oversaw one of the UKs worst ever public health failures. Here we look back at the prime ministers Covid battle and assess how he fared.Costly confusionClear communication is crucial in a crisis, but confusion undermined public health messaging from the start. In February 2020, days after the UK confirmed its first cases, the government urged everyone to wash their hands regularly. On 3 March, Sages behavioural science experts said ministers should advise people to avoid hugging and shaking hands too. If the PM got the memo, he didnt act on it.At a press briefing the same evening, he said: Im shaking hands continuously. I was at a hospital the other night where I think there were actually a few coronavirus patients and I shook hands with everybody ?I continue to shake hands. Downing Street said Johnson may not have seen the advice. But he was at it again days later, shaking hands with the TV presenter Phillip Schofield on 5 March and the boxer Anthony Joshua on 9 March.Herd immunityOn 12 March, the country switched tactics from containing Covid to delaying its spread. Rather than trying to stop all new infections, the <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley cup</a> aim was to flatten the curve and avoid everyone gett Aamm I d rather lose my job than my life : vulnerable people on the end of shielding
The Labour government s social justice credentials have taken another body blow with a report from the parliamentary joint committee on human rights. The report presents the findings from the committee s inquiry into the human rights obligations of the private sector, and will make awkward reading for the government and for many corpor <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.ro>stanley cupe</a> ations based in the UK.Most importantly, the committee has come out in support of a new commission to crack down on British companies continuing human rights violations and to make up for the government s failure to hold those companies to account.The cross-party committee expressed its concern at a new rash of allegations of human rights violations recently committed by British companies, several of which it described as having a woeful record abroad. For a parliamentary com <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.pl>kubki stanley</a> mittee wh <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.mx>termo stanley</a> ich tends to couch its criticism in the softest possible terms, this is a strong condemnation of UK plc s record around the world. Evidence published by the committee included allegations of involvement in serious human rights abuses by Anglo American, Rio Tinto, BP and many other household names .The committee focused much of its report on the government s obligation to ensure that British companies do not abuse human rights in their operations. In particular, the committee criticised the Labour government for its fixation with voluntary codes of conduct and other non-enforceable measures instead of binding rules to guarantee the accountabil
|