vmxa Landmark inquest to... 投稿者：Morrissmom 投稿日：2025/01/08(Wed) 04:11 No.20045133
Rmig South Africa s ICJ genocide case aimed at defending Hamas, Israel claims
I was disappointed by the court ruling on Michaela community schools prayer ban High court upholds top London schools ban on prayer rituals, 1 <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley canada</a> 6 April , and shocked to see the jubilant reaction from several prominent politicians. Children praying in school is not disruptive or threatening, and for Kemi Badenoch to suggest that these pupils are attempting to impose their views on an entire school community screams of xenophobia. With this ruling, its the other w <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk>stanley cups uk</a> ay around. The prayer ban tells Muslim children that their religious and cultural practices are foreign and undesirable, and in doing so forces conformity to a homogeneous British identity.I attended a Catholic school in Glasgow with a large number of Muslim students. Many wore hijabs and observed Ramadan, and every Friday a lot of my friends would go to a nearby mosque for midday prayers. In a school system where religious education was taught out of a te <a href=https://www.stanleymug.us>stanley mug</a> xtbook by old white men, having the opportunity to learn about other cultures through discussions with my peers and exposure to their lifestyles and practices was an enriching experience. Surely this environment of diversity, acceptance and understanding is one that our educators and politicians wish to cultivate Oliver EastwoodGlasgow Your article about the Michaela case mentions renewed discussion about whether faith and religion should have any role in the education system . The primary school options for my granddaughter this year were three faith schools within Eixj Lawyers wrestle once again with vexed question of referral fees
On Tuesday we received the result in the latest battle over workers rights. It was a fight between the Tory government and conservative British courts on one side and the court of justice of the European Union CJEU on the other. And the workers won.Gig economy workers on their jobs: They do exercise control over us Read moreThe judgment handed down by the CJEU, in the case of King v Sash Windows Workshop Ltd Richard Dollar, concerned the right to accumulate an entitlement to paid holidays for people who had not been given a right to paid time off by their employers. Indeed, King had worked from 1999 until 2012 without paid time off because his employer didnt give it to him. Due to a combination of legislation introduced by the coalition government to protect businesses and restrictive interpretations by UK tribunals and courts, King would at best have been able to claim up to two years holiday. After this judgment, he can claim <a href=https://www.mugs-stanley.us>stanley quencher</a> the whole lot.As lawyers have already been pointing out, the implications are enormous. This is particularly the case for workers in the so-called gig economy . This sector, comprising Uber drivers and CitySprint couriers am <a href=https://www.stanleycups.cz>stanley hrnek</a> ong others, is characterised by companies claiming the people who work for them are actually running their own independent small businesses and are therefore not entitled to the minimum wage or paid holidays, a practice t <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.uk>stanley cup</a> he tribunals have repeatedly shown to be unlawful.The governments plan of simply enshrining all EU-deri
|