pqoo Shaun Bailey under ... 投稿者：Morrissmom 投稿日：2025/01/06(Mon) 11:45 No.20040504
Phqu Judges reject MoJ plans for trials by video link and warn against cuts
Fifty years ago this year, my father published a book th [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley us[/url] at, in its small but profound way, helped to change the way people thought about others. It was called Conundrum, and it charted her journey from its famous opening, describing how she realised, sitting under my grandmothers piano in 1930, that I had been born into the wrong body, and should really be a girl , to undergoing gender reassignment surgery in Casablanca in 1972 ?from James Morris, the celebrated journalist and writer, to Jan Morris.Conundrum was ?and still is ?a seminal trans work, but it was not the first account of such a journey. There was, for example, Christine Jorgensens 1967 autobiography, which my father had read. In the US, a medical study, The Transsexual Phenomenon by Dr Harry Benjamin whom my father consulted in the 1960s , had appeared in 1966, and its distinction between transvestism cross-dressing and transsexuality had created considerable interest. By 1975, about a thousand transgender people in the US had quietly been provided with gender reassignment surgery.But Conundrum was the first autobiographical account by someone who was already celebrated for something other than gender orie [url=https://www.stanleycups.ro]stanley cups[/url] ntation. James Morris had achieved instant fame in 1953 as the sole reporter on the successful British Everest expedition, becoming internationally known as The Man Who Scooped the World on Everest . He had then bee [url=https://www.stanley-cups.es]stanley cup[/url] n a high-profile foreign correspondent for the Times and the Guardian, reporting from the Cssf Family courts failing victims of abuse and rape, say experts calling for inquiry
Donald Trumps lawyers urged the US supreme court on Thursday to reverse a judicial decision disqualifying the former president from Colorados Republican primary ballot as the justices prepare to tackle the politically explosive case.Trumps lawy [url=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.ca]stanley cup canada[/url] ers in court papers presented the former US presidents main arguments against a Colorado supreme court ruling on 19 December barring him from the primary ballot over his actions around the January 6 Capitol attack, citing the 14th amendment of the US constitution.Judge in Trump case sets hearing over Fani Willis conflict-of-interest claimsRead moreThe justices have scheduled oral arguments in the case for 8 February.Trumps lawyers urged the court to put a swift and decisive end to these ballot-disqualification efforts , noting that similar efforts were under way in more than 30 states.The lawyers said the 1 [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.co.uk]stanley uk[/url] 4th amendment provision does not apply to presidents, that the question of presidential eligibility is reserved to Congress, and that Trump did not participate in an insurrection.The brief adheres to an accelerated schedule set by the justices on 5 January when they agreed to take up the case. Colorados Republican primary is set for 5 M [url=https://www.cups-stanley.uk]stanley cup uk[/url] arch.Trump is the frontrunner for his partys nomination to challenge Joe Biden in the November 5 election.The plaintiffs ?six conservative Republican or independent voters in Colorado ?challenged Trumps eligibility to run for office in light of his actions before the attack.They now have until 31 Jan
|