hepi Scientists Create a... 投稿者：MethrenSor 投稿日：2025/01/11(Sat) 10:58 No.20053469 
Pmar Did Nike Not Get the Memo on Plastic Beads
blah blah The Winds of Winter blah blah 11 years since A Da <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cup</a> nce With Dragons came out blah blah waiting forever blah blah never finishing it blah blah etc. But now, Martin has offered a vitally important update on the long-, long-awaited sixth volume in his A Song of Ice and Fire fantasy epic: its long. Sorry, that was it. More than a decade in, and GRRM has dropped the revelatory bombshell that The Winds of Winter, should it ever be brought into our material plane, will be a long book. From his Not a Blog blog: THE WINDS OF WINTER is going to be a big book. The way it is going, it could be bigger than A STORM OF SWORDS or A DANCE WITH DRAGONS, the longest books in the series to date. I do usually cut and trim once I finish, but I need to finish first. So. The sixth installment of a series already known for being comprised of long books will also be a long book. In fact, it might be the longest book. Or it may not. Who knows Not George R.R. Martin, who still doesnt seem to have an end in sight for writing the ding-dang thing, let alone publishing it. Im a firm believer that Martin doesnt owe his fans anything, and if The Winds of Winter doesnt come out itll be a huge bummer, but its not worth threatening him or hassling him over. But whenever he gives an update on the book, its all banal <a href=https://www.stanley-quencher.co.uk>stanley quencher</a> information <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley cup</a> thats designed to generate interest without ever saying anything substantial. Please take a look at io9 Winds of Winter coverage from the past few years: ?GRRM Says Ikoj Heroes Rising Is So Incredibly Bonkers, It Might Just Break My Hero Academia
Although these type of labels are completely necessarye all know the nightmare of receiving an outrageously high internet billhe FCC wasted the opportunity to make a label that <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es>termo stanley</a> is useful and also easy to use. The introduction of these labels was botched from the very beginning. The FCC said in a statement that it asked its Consumer Advisory Committee to recommend a disclosure format that should be clear and easy to readimilar to a nutrition label on food items. The problem is that the FDAs food labels are not a shining example of success. In 2013, FDA researchers discovered that its own labels were mostly confusing to consumers and tried a new redesign a year late <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.co.uk>stanley cup uk</a> r. But the biggest problem is the notices are meant to be read online, a <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.de>stanley becher</a> nd theyre following a design format made for print. The same rules dont apply when youre talking about a website, said UI designer and known government design critic Andrew Miller in an interview with Gizmodo. You shouldnt put all of the data right up front. Thats not usable. Essentially, the FCC didnt learn the lesson that took the FDA years to fix. In this side by side of food labels the updated version shown on the right , you can see a noticeable data hierarchy. While not perfect by any means, it at least highlights what information is importantike total calories and servings per containernd then drills into the specifics. The FCCs new label doesnt even attempt to explain what data packet loss means, and gives it equal
|