nezr Hundreds of snakes ... 投稿者:MethrenSor 投稿日:2024/12/10(Tue) 06:57 No.19757222
Tjej Police: 3 exotic animals still loose in Ohio The No. 1 killer of troops in Iraq is the roadside bomb, called IED s, short for Improvised Explosive Device. By 2004, the top request from the U.S. command in Iraq was the ability to target IED networks. Congress poured in tens of millions of dollars to a company called MZM - but deaths and injuries continued to soar, CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports for Follow the Money.It was the job of intelligence officer Maj. Eric Egland to find out why. It was my job to do a field evaluation of this program, Egland said.In an exclusive interview, Egland told us he discovered stunning lapses on the part of MZM, which only hird a third of the employees they were paid for What you re hoping for is fewer IED injuries; more IEDs targeted and found Attkisson asked. Yeah, help the combat units go after the networks that are using IEDs against us, Egland said.But what really was happening The capability that was being funded was given an unqualified contractor, who failed at even the most basic level to provide the right people, the right resour <a href=https://www.stanleymugs.us>stanley flask</a> ces and the right capability to help our troops deal with the No. 1 threat in Iraq, Egland <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.ca>stanley mug</a> said. With American lives at stake, Egland couldn t imagine how a company like MZM got such a crucial contract. His next assignment took him to a place where he could fi <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley cup website</a> nd the answer: The Pentagon.There, Egland did some digging and found MZM had gotten millions in Defense contracts - courtesy of Rep. Duke Cun Znxv Fashion editor loses hand in plane propeller In the daily hubbub of current crises facing humanity, we forget about the many generations we hope are yet to come. Not those who will live 200 years from now, but 1,000 or 10,000 years from now. Photo Credit: U.S. Department of Energy | CC BY 2.0 I use the word hope because we face risks, called existential risks, that threaten to wipe out humanity. These risks are not just for big disasters, but for the disasters that could end history. Not everyone has ignored the long future though. Mystics like Nostradamus have regularly tried to calculate the end of the world. HG Wells tried to develop a science of forecasting and famously depicted the fa <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley botella</a> r future of humanity in his book The Time Machine. Other writers built other long-term futures to warn, amuse or speculate. But had these pioneers or futurologists not thought about humanitys future, it would not have changed the outcome. There wasnt much that human beings in their place could have done to save us from an existential crisis or <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley quencher</a> even cause one. We are in a more privileged position today. Human activity has been s <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.pl>stanley termosy</a> teadily shaping the future of our planet. And even though we are far from controlling natural disasters, we are developing technologies that may help mitigate, or at least, deal with them. Future Imperfect Yet, these risks remain understudied. There is a sense of powerlessness and fatalism about them. People have been talking apocalypses for millennia, but few have tried to prevent them. Humans are also b
|