lvhn UK supreme court ge... 投稿者：Morrissmom 投稿日：2025/01/08(Wed) 17:32 No.20047624
Iyds Oxford student union to run consent classes for LGBTQ students
John Harvey Letters, 8 May cites the loss by <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es>botella stanley</a> Labour to the Conservatives of North East Derbyshire council as an example of local issues determining the outcome of local elections, in this case the public opposition to the councils plans to develop green field land for housing. Interestingly, in adjoining Derbyshire Dales district council, the ruling Tories lost all of their seats in Matlock to the Lib Dems, primarily because of local opposition to housing developments on greenfield land.The truth is that whate <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.us>stanley cup price</a> ver party is in power locally, they are being forced by central government policy to deliver housing on such sites, under threat of sanctions and massive costs in defending appeals by developers. I doubt there are many local councillors from any party who want to see their local green land covered in large houses built to bring profits to developers, rather than develop brownfield to meet local housing need. This may appear to be a local issue, but it is centrally driven, determined by the current government and their coalition predecessors, egged on by the big housebuilders.Councils of every stripe are getting punished at the polls for this situation, but whoever is in power in any given local authority will find themselves unde <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.es>stanley cup</a> r the exact same pressures, and powerless to do much about it.Isabella StoneSheffield It is to be welcomed if the recent election results prove local politics is alive and well Letters, 8 May . But for that to happen one has to be able to vo Vzru Portsmouth GP who gambled away 1.1m of NHS money is jailed
Christians and other faith groups do have the right to manifest their religious beliefs in the workplace but it is a right that must be balanced against the rights of others.That conclusion, reached by the European court of human rights in response to claims brou <a href=https://www.canada-stanley.ca>stanley cup</a> ght against the British government by four individual Christians, should come as no surprise. But the detailed ruling shows how difficult it was for the seven Strasbourg judges who heard the claims to apply this broad principle to the cas <a href=https://www.cups-stanley-cups.uk>stanley cups uk</a> es they were deciding.Take the case of Lilian Ladele, the registrar of births, deaths and marriages <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.uk>stanley quencher</a> who lost her job when she refused to conduct civil partnership ceremonies. By a majority of five votes to two, the Strasbourg judges dismissed her claim that she had suffered discrimination in comparison to a registrar with no religious objection to same-sex unions.That was because the local authority for which she worked also had a legitimate duty to protect the rights of same-sex couples. The human rights court generally allows member states a wide discretion ?what it calls a margin of appreciation ?when it comes to striking a balance between competing rights. According to the five judges in the majority, the decision to sack her was within that discretion.But look at what the two minority judges ?from Montenegro and Malta ?had to say. Recalling that civil partnership ceremonies did not exist in 2002 when Ladele became a registrar in London, the judges found that quot
|