gduu Exxon Isn t the Onl... 投稿者：MethrenSor 投稿日：2025/01/06(Mon) 01:09 No.20039849 
Vefy Kang on, Marvel s Ant-Man 3 Might Have Just Nabbed Lovecraft Country s Jonathan Majors
was to turn on a very large faucet in Oregon. Unfortunately, experts contend that not only does said faucet not exist but building one would be prohibitively expensive and inefficient. In an appar [url=https://www.stanleycups.ro]stanley cup[/url] ent effort [url=https://www.stanley1913.com.es]vaso stanley[/url] to address the pressing issue of California water shortages, Trump said the following: You have millions of gallons of water pouring down from the north with the snow caps and Canada, and all pouring down and they have essentially a very large faucet. You turn the faucet and it takes one day to turn it, and its massive, its as big as the wall of that building right there behind you. You turn that, and all of that water aimlessly goes into the Pacific Ocean , and if they turned it back, all of that water would come right down here and right into Los Angeles, he said. Amidst his weird, almost poetic rambling, the very large faucet Trump seems to have been ref [url=https://www.stanleycup.cz]stanley cup[/url] erring to is the Columbia River. The Columbia runs from a lake in Canada, down through Oregon and, like Trump said, eventually ends up in the Pacific Ocean. Trump apparent plan is to somehow divert water from the Columbia and get it all the way down to Los Angeles. However, scientific experts who have spoken to the press have noted that not only is there currently no way to divert the water from the Oregon river to southern California, but creating such a system would likely be prohibitively expensive and inefficient. There is indeed no such diversion system and none has been s Tjqj Twitter Asks Android Users: Did You Even Read the Article
I learned this thanks to a revision in Twitters privacy policy that rolled out yesterday, which gives users more information about how advertisers see them and lets them toggle which bits of information they want to share. This includes a list of stuff that Twitter has determined each individual user i [url=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.ca]stanley cup[/url] s interested in. My list has 69 interests on it, including Dads, and Twitter has presumably shared that list with at least 2,368 advertisers. Im not here to dad-shame, but 8230; what Im not into dads!!! This revelation made me feel uncomfortable and confused. Why not moms What does interested in dads say about me as a person What would Twitter advertise to me based on this, novelty ties or DVDs of Full House I scrubbed through my Twitter account for the word dad. What the hell did I tweet to bring this upon myself I guess its nice that Twit [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley cup[/url] ter is letting us know at least. Were updating our privacy policy to bring you a more personalized Twitter experience, Twitter said in an in-app notification announcing the change. Well soon be making Twitter more relevant by using your visits to sites with Twitter content. And weve given you even more control over your data. Twitters certainly not the only site building detailed and complex user profiles to sell to advertisers擣acebook and Google do this kind of thing, too. But Twi [url=https://www.cup-stanley.es]stanley botella[/url] tter is offering its users a unique look into how the algorithmic sausage that is social media advertising gets made. Unlike other sites, howeve
|